In contemporary society, having a strong background of education provides a good platform for people to express their abilities, and share their own viewpoints with others. However, when a documental paper about on a particularly social issue from someone’s perspective, in order to reach its expected audience and gain the acceptance in public, it depends on various factors rather than the author’s owned creativities only.
The situation
In March 2011, the Berita Harian newspaper was troubled by a massive reaction from the public against its publication of the worst disasters of Japan. A series of strong earthquakes swept north-east Japan together with a 10 meter tsunami destroy buildings, vehicles and debris across swaths of farmland (McCurry & Branigan 2011). There are many major damages caused by the natural disasters in Japan, especially an explosion of Fukushima nuclear power plant which releases the risk of radioactive materials to the environment (BBC News 2011).
When all the communities all over the world pray and offer their sympathy for the loss of human and property of Japan, the cartoon which depicts the devastating tsunami and earthquake seems to be so distasteful and insensitive towards the Japanese (Pek Mei 2011). As a solution to soothe the indignation of the audience, the daily newspaper’s editor had to issue an apology over its publication with a sophistry: ‘We had no intention of poking fun at the disaster that has befallen the nation of Japan and its people. In fact, we greatly sympathize with their plight and share the sorrow of the Japanese people’.
The lesson
It is a valuable lesson for all of people who work in the publication industries, especially students who intend to pursuit designing documents as their future career. As indicated by Schrito and Yell (...), due to the nature of social semiotic system which has a range of potential meanings, document designers are required to comprehend the social context in which the potential meanings has a fundamental platform to express its actualization in real life situation.
Although the visual elements have their own advantage which is stated ‘a picture is worth a thousand words’ (Schriver 1997), the application of such expressive power in a document would rely on a cognitive research about cultural knowledge and personal beliefs and attitudes in order that the document can present precisely what the authors/ writers try to convey, as well as communicate effectually with its audience.
References:
2. McCurry, J & Branigan, T 2011, Powerful earthquakes hit Japan, The Guardian, lasted viewed 5th June 2011, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/11/japan-earthquake-miyagi-tsunami-warning>.
3. Pek Mei, W 2011, Berita Harian issues public apology over tsunami cartoon, The Star, lasted viewed 5th June 2011, <http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/3/14/nation/8262608&sec=nation >.
4. Schirato, T & Yell, S 2000, ‘Chapter 3: Communication as social practice’, in Communication and cultural literacy: an introduction, Allen & Unwin, Australia (UNISA electronic library).
5. Schriver, KA 1997, Dynamics in document design: creating texts for readers, Wiley Computer Pub, New York.